who failed at everything they ever did. Yet all of them and the people below are helping him
cover up the largest mass murder in US history...
Some of them like Richard Clarke
and Paul O'Neil have come out for less.
-The NYC Fire fighters
who know more about building collapses than
if not all,
It's their LIFE to know. Literally! Yet they don't call for
an investigation into the MASS MURDER of over 300 of their
brothers... Why? (The twisting of these peoples’ statements
for donations and DVD sales sickens me.) We have uncovered
the myth about a gag order imposed on all fire fighters.
Only 9/11 conspiracy sites say this. ONE person who sued
Bush for not taking action before the event is ordered by
the court not to speak to the media about the case. This is
not imposing a gag order on the whole fire department as
some of these sites claim. They are lying to cover up this
mass murder by the government or the building owner. Why?
They don't even know...
Conspiracy theorists bring up an article in Fire House
magazine which says the fire department wanted to stop the
steel from being sold in order to test the fire proofing and
other non-bomb/controlled demolition related investigations.
They twist the article’s context to make it seem like the
firefighters questioned the idea that fire brought down the
Many of these men and women come from the military, yet we
are to believe they are so afraid they rather die in the
government’s next mass murder than come out and expose this.
-The courts for imposing a gag
order [SEE above]
-The NYC Police department who lost over 20 lives. They
didn't ask for an investigation. Motive? None...
-The NYC port Authority who lost
-All the people in the
who have not called for an investigation. Many who are
liberal and centrist. They did or said nothing while people
supposedly trucked in airplane parts to cover the crime.
Why? Again, no answer...
-The more than 1,600 widows and widowers of 9/11
would rather have investigations of the decisions which led
to the terrorist getting away with this. They don't want to
waste time investigating the mass murder of their loved
ones. Even the Jersey Girls. Why? They say it's the money...
[note: Whenever killing someone, pay off the relative. They
won’t say anything.]
(This one I almost believe) who doesn't follow up on the
biggest mass murder and conspiracy in American history. It
seems no one wants a Nobel prize for journalism. Not only
the American media but foreign press like the BBC and Al
Jazeera. Why? No answer here either...
-The photographers from around the world who took pictures
of the towers which clearly show bowing of the perimeter columns. These photos
support the NIST hypothesis that the sagging trusses lead to the collapse. Some
photos also show the core intact shortly after collapse which also not only
support the NIST hypothesis but discredits the "Controlled demolition" account.
-Popular Mechanics who debunked these sites are also
helping Bush commit the biggest mass murder in history.
-PBS Nova since they created a documentary explaining in
detail how and why the buildings fell. None of it said bomb.
-Everyone in the NIST
who covers up the largest mass murder in US history. This
independent organization doesn't have a moral person in
hundreds of employees because not one has come out exposing
this so called "Conspiracy". In fact, the hundreds of
scientist who signed onto the report are willing to not only
lie for Bush but cover up the largest mass murder in
American history. Some suggest only a handful can do the job
but that's simply impossible. The team in charge of the
computer modeling has to be in sync with the team of
structural engineers and so on. There are hundreds involved
in this investigation and every team has to work with other
teams using the same evidence and specifications.
-NY Governor Pataki
because he sold steel
from the WTC for the construction of the USS New York. If
the argument is the government sold the steel in order to
cover up the crime then Pataki is one of the criminals.
-The NY city scrap yards
because they also sold steel to
China before all of it was tested. Bush would have needed to call them up and
tell them to sell it before they could have investigated every beam. A task
which would have taken years and years not to mention millions more. Ironically
the republican Mayor Bloomberg could not be involved since he asked the scrap
yards not to sell the steel on behalf of the firefighters.
-EVERY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER IN THE WORLD
who doesn't write a paper for a mainstream peer reviewed
journal saying the towers were brought down and could not
have fallen due to fire. If laymen can prove things just by
looking at videos and reading interviews out of context,
then all those structural engineers MUST be working for Bush
right? Even the ones in other countries. Why? The answer
they give is that the engineers don't know about Jones’
work. So in all this time no one has e-mailed Jones' work to
any structural engineer?
-Structure Magazine who published a report saying the
collapse of WTC 7 may have been due to one column failing.
-The liberals who don't believe the towers were brought
down. (Like me) They're helping a neo-con cover-up the largest mass murder in this
nation’s history. Why? No clue...
-The American Society of Civil Engineers who have
produced peer reviewed papers showing how what Conspiracy
Theorists say is impossible is possible.
-The FAA who saw planes which conspiracy theorists say never
-The Silverstein Group who they say got together with
Bush to blow up the building for insurance money.
Insurance Company who didn't question the collapse and
paid out over 2 billion to Silverstein. Why? Conspiracy
Theorists say the insurance company just wants to pass on the
bill to the public but they already fought Silverstein in a
number of law suits concerning the amount.
-American Airlines (Pentagon)
-United Airlines (Pentagon)
-Logan, Newark and Dulles Airport for losing the planes
-Scientists and engineers who developed the remote
control plane technology
-Installers of the remote control devices in the planes
-Remote controllers of the planes (Pentagon)
-Scientists and engineers who developed the new
demolition technology and carried out practical tests
and computer models to make sure it would work.
-Installers of the demolitions devices in the three
-People who worked at the company(s) the installers used as
-Airphone etc employees who said they got calls from
-Faux friends and relatives of the faux passengers or just
the faux relatives who claim to have been called by their
loved ones or just the psyops who fooled relatives into
thinking they really were their loved ones. (Pentagon)
-People who detonated the buildings"
-anyone who thinks the conspiracy is a diversion to take
liberal activist focus off of real crimes.
Even conspiracies with a few people are doomed. Look at
Enron and Watergate. The more people you involve, the more likely the conspiracy
will fall apart. The amount of people needed for this conspiracy could fill one
of the towers. It's absurd to think this many people could keep a mass murder
for Bush secret for this long. Absurd...
A common excuse
for no one coming out who was part of this so called
9/11 conspiracy is they fear death. If you analyze the
argument carefully you realize they are debunking
themselves. Why would even people in the military be more
fearful of exposing this than the common conspiracy
theorists behind a computer monitor? Either they don't
believe what they're saying or they actually think they are
more fearless than the thousands of others who would have
had to be "in on it". As if people in the CIA or FBI
couldn't figure out how to get the message out if they
wanted to without exposing who they are. People, dates,
places, memos and other evidence could easily be
disseminated to the public without exposing who they are.
The only reason they claim the people are paralyzed with
fear is because they have too in order for the conspiracy
story to work.
Noam Chomsky on
9/11 Conspiracy theories
More from Noam Chomsky
"...I am not
persuaded by the assumption that much documentation and
other evidence has been uncovered. To determine that, we'd
have to investigate the alleged evidence.
Take, say, the physical evidence. There are ways to assess
that: submit it to specialists -- of whom there are
thousands -- who have the requisite background in
civil-mechanical engineering, materials science, building
for review and analysis; and one cannot
gain the required knowledge by surfing the internet.
In fact, that's been done, by the professional association
of civil engineers. Or, take the course pursued by anyone
who thinks they have made a genuine discovery: submit it to
a serious journal for peer review and publication. To my
knowledge, there isn't a single submission."
this reaches the heart of the matter. One
of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to
draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from
to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional
background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up
the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that
thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11
movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power
than is the norm for serious critical and activist work.
How do you personally set priorities? That's of course up to
you. I've explained my priorities often, in print as well as
elsewhere, but we have to make our own judgments."
don't see any reason to accept the presuppositions. As for
the consequences, in one of my first interviews after 9/11 I
pointed out the obvious: every power system
in the world was going to exploit it for its own interests:
the Russians in Chechnya, China against the Uighurs, Israel
in the occupied territories,... etc., and states would
exploit the opportunity to control their own populations
more fully through "prevention of terrorism acts" and the
like. By the "who gains" argument, every power system in the
world could be assigned responsibility for 9/11."
think the Bush administration would have had to be utterly
insane to try anything like what is alleged, for their own
and do not think that serious evidence has been provided to
support claims about actions that would not only be
outlandish, for their own interests, but that have no remote
historical parallel. The effects, however, are all too
clear, namely, what I just mentioned: diverting activism and
commitment away from the very serious ongoing crimes of
More critical thinking from Noam
"There is just overwhelming evidence
that the Bush administration wasn't involved—very elementary
evidence. You don't have to be a physicist to understand it,
you just have to think for a minute. OK? So lets think for a
minute. There's a couple of facts which are uncontroversial:
#1. One fact that is uncontroversial is that
the Bush Administration desperately wanted to invade Iraq.
That's a long standing goal, there is good reasons for it -
second largest energy resources in the world - right in the
middle of the worlds major energy producing regions -
perfectly obvious reasons, which they in fact later stated.
But they were obvious anyway. So they wanted to invade Iraq.
One uncontroversial fact.
#2. Second uncontroversial
fact - They didn't blame 9/11 on Iraqis, they blamed it on
Saudis - mainly - that's their major ally. So they blamed it
on people from their major ally, not on the country they
wanted to invade.
#3. Third uncontroversial fact -
Unless they're total lunatics, they would have blamed it on
Iraqis if they were involved in any way. That would have
given them open season on invading Iraq. Total support -
international support - the UN resolution - no need to
concocked a wild stories of weapons of mass destruction,
contacts between Sadam and Al Qaeda which quickly exploded
discrediting them. No reason to invade Afghanistan in which
it has been mostly a waste of time for them - but they
didn't. Well, the conclution is pretty straight forward.
Either they are total lunitics or they weren't involved."